Safe Distance

ac130gunship2.jpg

“For men at war, the function of the weapon is the function of the eye”
Paul Virilio

I’m currently reading a fairly interesting book entitled Witness, Memory, Representation and the Media in Question ( ed. Ulrik Ekman and Frederik Tygstrup, Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, 2008), based on the proceedings of a symposium held at the European Summer School in Cultural Studies, Copenhagen, August 25, 2004. One of the most striking essays is the one written by Mikkel Bruun Zangenberg, ‘Witnessing at War’. In it he comes up with the term ‘the belligerent gaze’ as “an umbrella-expression designating a diversity of perhaps internally heteregoneous modes of looking in and at warfare”. He focusses on two distinct events, World War I and the incidents in the Abu Ghraib prison, in order to explore the changes in modes and conditions of “witnessing”, referring to the writings of Erich Maria Remarque, Ernst Jünger, Primo Levi, and others. All these authors seem to agree on the “peculiarly aporetic nature of witnessing and trauma: be it in the form of blindness and insight, of a non-coincidence between fact and truth, of the detrimenal and coercive contamination of all on the inside as well as the outside, or of the bleak curse and guilt of the inauthentic survivor.” What is rejected is the ’emperical’ notion of the witness as someone who ‘saw it with his of her own eyes’. Zangenberg’s claim is that the condition of witnessing is evaded and destroyed, circumvented or paralysed. In WWI soldiers were ‘derealized’, turned into some form of ghost – or else, appearing as pilots (see Virilio’s War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception), in which case their sight is reduced to an exclusively streategic and destructive gaze – they see victims, but never witnesses their obliteration. 90 years later, in the Abu Ghraib case, the conditions of witnessing are perverted and caricatured by the degrading videos of humiliated prisoners. Or the deceased civilians are not seen at all, they literally become invisible (see Judith Butler’s Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence).

Zangenberg considers the erosion of these modes and conditions, leading to “the obliteration of witnessing”, in part due to the contemporary role played by media and the proliferation of digital imagery. He refers to the ideas of Virilio, who writes about the dehumanizing, automated appearance of surveillance and seeing in the 20th century warfare and proposes that the emergence of unmanned planes and missiles (“intelligent weapons”) inaugurated the virtual dissapearance of witnessing. In War and Cinema Virilio quotes W.J. Perry, a former US Under-secretary of State for Defense, as saying “once you can see the target, you can expect to destroy it”. Virilio adds: “For men at war, the function of the weapon is the function of the eye””. “Obviously”, Zannenberg writes, “this circumstance is intensified when there is only a machinic eye casting a belligerent, neutral and automated glance at an infrared shape representing a human body” (see Manuel de Landa’s War in the Age of Intelligent Machines). The new kind of automated images have suggested a new surgical precision of warfare. War is the subject of these images, but it is also a means of creating subjects, visual subjects. In the Gulf War strategy, the agency belongs to the “West” seen from the point of view of the weapons themselves. Pictures were transmitted showing their “view” of their targets right up until the moment of impact (see Nicholas Mirzoeff’ Watching Babylon: The War in Iraq and Global Visual Culture). In these shots – according to a theory put forward by the philosopher Klaus Theweleit- bomb and reporter are identical.

For example, these images were taken in 2002, when about 2.000 troops from the US led military coalition were engaged in close in combat with small pockets of suspected al Qaeda and Taliban fighters in the rugged terrain of northeastern Afghanistan, as part of an operation called Operation Acaconda…. This footage was filmed from US gunship helicopters that were part of this mission. At the same time these pictures show the distance between the pilot and the battlefield. (Found in OVNI’s Babylon Archives. Fragments of these shots were appropriated by Dominic Angerame – in Anaconda Targets – and Christoph Büchel – in AC-130 Gunship Targeting Video (Afghanistan 12/6/2002)).

The images below were recorded during NATO air strikes against former Yugoslavia. There were 4 US AIR Force airplanes flying from a NATO-base in Italy to a destination in Yugoslavia. Mission objective was to bomb several targets in the area around the city of Novi Sad. On the way back, after the mission was completed, one of the planes was shot. This tape was found near the crashed plane in the Fruska Gora mountains in the Srem region. It shows the electronic cockpit with basic graphical interface and voice communication between the pilots. This videotape is a regular flight document used by command structures to analyze its efficiency and success after very mission. It presents the last moments before the plane crashed. The blue image signifies the end for the pilot: no image, no place, no reality. (Found on Kuda.org)

The loss of the ‘genuine picture’ means the eye no longer has a role as historical witness. It has been said that what was brought into play in the Gulf War was not new weaponry but rather a new policy on images. In this way the basis for electronic warfare was created. Today, kilo tonnage and penetration are less important than the so-called C3I cycle, which has come to encircle our world. C3I refers to “Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence” and means global and tactical early warning systems, area surveillance through seismic, acoustic and radar sensors, radio direction sounding, monitoring opponents’ communications, as well as the use of jamming to suppress all these techniques.
Harun Farocki explores these issues in many of his films and installations. In War at a Distance (2003) he focusses on how, since the first Gulf War, it has virtually impossible to distinguish between real pictures and those generated on a computer. The image is no longer used only as testimony, but also as an indispensable link in a process of production and destruction. In Bilder der Welt und Inschrift des Krieges (1989) he researches the interconnection – and at times, disjunction – between cognition and recognition in Images of the World and the Inscription of War. The film is based on an event which took place in 1944, when an Allied aircraft took topographic photographs of Auschwitz during a routine surveillance operation for power plants, munitions factories, chemical plants, and any other industrial complexes that could potentially serve as bombing targets that, in the military’s myopic search for these high collateral targets that would cripple the German war machine, failed to recognize that they had actually taken an aerial survey of the layout of the Auschwitz concentration camp – an explicitly detailed, but mentally unregistered discovery for which the implicit meaning would not be realized until decades later, long after the tragic reality of the Nazi death camps had been exposed. Investigates this conceptual image of a “blind spot” and the binding of the gaze, the film illustrates the conceptual introduction of quantifying images measured from a “safe” distance into discrete elements that can be uniquely identified or accurately reproduced remotely into scale models and detailed simulations. Christa Blümlinger wrote about the film: “one’s thoughts are not free when machines, in league with science and the military, dictate what is to be investigated. This is the essence of media violence, of Paul Virilio’s ‘terrorist aesthetic’ of optic stimulation, which today appears on control panels as well as on television, with its goal of making the observer either an accomplice or a potential victim, as in times of war”.

imagesoftheworld12cd.jpg

For Zangenberg this concerns the duress of being the subject of the belligerent gaze. He writes: “I contend that the one who cast the belligerent gaze, the one who is the subject and master of that gaze, is barred from ever becoming a witness; he may well ‘see everything’, but since he is always at a safe distance, and since he is the one who produces death, he cannot properly turn into a witness. Being the object of the belligerent gaze, on the other hand, is a position of passivity, vulnerability, fear, horror, and suffering, if not being exposed to the numbing effect of alienation and derealization. Either way, war is engaged in a constant process of un-witnessing.”

Abuse of Power

horse.jpg

Just got this message from Emily Foreman via Brian Holmes. “This material from Emily Foreman is important to get out. Despite the good news from the polls we are still living under the boot here in the USA. Poor people’s lives get wasted in the war, and when they try to participate in the democracy they were supposed to be fighting for they get their skull crushed by the police. When is this gonna stop?- BH”

Hello All-

I just wanted to draw your attention to this video, particularly these video stills, that i shot during the Iraq Veterans Against the War protest at the final U.S. presidential debates, last Wednesday, in Long Island, NY. The video is extremely disturbing and clearly shows Iraq War Veteran Nick Morgan at the moment when his head was crushed to the sidewalk under a police horse. This story has been completely ignored in the media. He was legally, peacefully and standing on the sidewalk when the event occurred.

The still images speak volumes to this moment in history, please look at them and please get them to people (journalists, activists, veterans) who can use them!

Last Wednesday October 15th 2008, former Army Sergeant Nick Morgan, a 24 year old veteran of the US war in Iraq, was nearly killed by riot police, his face crushed under a police horse, during a peaceful protest outside the final US presidential debates.

Morgan is a native of Annapolis, MD who spent four-years the US Army and one year in Iraq. He was a participant in the Winter Soldier hearings and is an active member of the Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW), a national organization of ‘Global War On Terror’ veterans who had come to the Presidential debates in Long Island, demanding that veterans’ concerns be heard during these nationally televised dialogues.

The IVAW had previously announced, sending a letter to CBS, that two veterans had prepared one question each for Obama and McCain, to be asked during the televised debate. They had also announced that if they didn’t receive a response by 7pm on the night of the debates, that those veterans would enter the debates anyway, in an attempt to be seen, if not actually have their voices heard.

On Wednesday, as the sun was going down, the veterans waited for a response with a crowd of civilian supporters. When no response came from CBS, Obama, or McCain by 7pm, they led a march peacefully to the gate of the debates. Seven veterans were arrested while attempting to enter the gate of the national debates.

Nassau county police immediately began pushing the crowd of media, veterans and supporters backwards and across the street, charging riot cops and horses into the tightly packed crowd. One officer, Officer Quagliano was seen by many witnesses to be driving his horse backwards, in circles and out of control, repeatedly antagonizing Nick Morgan and a group of Iraq War vets who were peacefully holding the front of the line. The IVAW veterans are committed to non-violence and committed to protecting ‘civilians’ that come out to support them. Video shows him swiping Morgan and veteran Carlos Harris with the head of his horse just a few minutes before trampling them on the ground.

After the crowd was divided in two and fully pushed back onto the sidewalk with nowhere to go, Officer Quagliano continued to run his horse into the crowd and in circles ON the sidewalk. Riot police on foot began pulling people from the tightly packed sidewalk and into the way of Quagliano’s out of control horse. At least three civilians and and three veterans were knocked to the ground and trampled in the undertow.

This video clearly shows the moment of impact as Officer Quagliano’s horse backs up and steps on Nick Morgan’s face. He immediately lost consciousness and his lower orbital was shattered in 3 places. After nearly being killed, suffering a concussion and bleeding profusely from the head, police actually refused to allow other soldiers and friends to give him medical attention and to protect him from Quagliano’s horse, still stomping inches from his body.

A police statement later claimed that quote “a ‘person’ may have been injured when their body came into contact with a horse.” While the event happened quickly and in the pitch black, the momentary flashes in the darkness reveal a different story.

Instead, Nick Morgan was flipped, tugged, and dragged by police, bruising and cutting his abdomen. He was pulled from the crowd, face wiped, and thrown in an arrest van with other arrested veterans.

Morgan, who already suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder after his tour of duty in Iraq, was eventually taken to Nassau County hospital where he was handcuffed to a gurney, cat-scanned and given a prescription for antibiotics and Motrin. Ironically, Morgan and other members of Iraq Veterans Against the War had come to the October debates with the intention of asking candidates pointed questions about lack of care for veterans.

A few hours later he was taken to jail, chained to a bench for five hours, and given a November 10th court appearance ticket for a charge of disorderly conduct.

Multiple veterans and civilians were injured by horses. All were given insufficient medical attention at Nassau County hospital. Veteran Carlos Harris had his foot stepped on and was refused an X-ray at Nassau County. IVAW supporter Devra Shore actually heard her foot crack under the hooves a horse, and she too was denied any diagnosis in Nassau County.

Nick Morgan has nerve damage and his vision is still blurry. He underwent facial reconstructive surgery this morning to keep his crushed cheekbone from sinking into his face.

The reality is that American police nearly killed an American vet last week with immunity, and with complete silence from the media, as he peacefully exercised those ‘constitutional freedoms’ he was sworn to protect and was supposedly fighting for across the world. Anti-war Veterans like Nick Morgan have suffered a double betrayal, in Iraq and at home, and their voices deserve to be heard, if not by the presidential candidates, then by the American people themselves.

i witness
Iraq Veterans Against the War
IVAW media contact for Nick Morgan is – matthis(at)ivaw(dot)org
Video and video still requests – Emily Forman – multiplefronts(at)gmail(dot)com

Dust to Digital

blackmirror3.jpg

“What will future generations discover of our music, old busted hard drives?”
Aquarius Records review of ‘Victrola Favorites: Artifacts from Bygone Days’

Yesterday I went to a lecture of Ian Nagoski, musician and music obsessive tout court, who mainly talked about his work as anthologist of early recordings. He recently compiled Black Mirror: Reflections in Global Music, a selection of recordings culled from 78 rpm records that he’s collected throughout his life, all from purchases he’s made from flea markets, thrift stores, or private collections (he claims he spent about 125 dollars for all the recording represented on the disc). They range from a Cameroonian ensemble experimenting with the clavioline in the early 1950’s to the theme song of a Indian thriller flick from 1949, a Lao monk prayer recital from 1928 to a song by a 10 year old Swedish boy playing the zither. In the liner notes he writes about his own experience locating, discovering (not only the records but also the contextual info, which is the most adventurous part of the search), and falling in love with the music. “Compilations of this kind that I really admire the most – three come to mind immediately,” Nagoski said. “Pete Whelan’s Really! The Country Blues on OJL, the Harry Smith Anthology of American Folk Music, and Pat Conte’s Secret Museum of Mankind. Those are documents of a particular man’s obsessions and private sound world and he’s sharing this piece of it with you. So that was the point – this is the sound world that I have occupied. I didn’t make these myself, but this is my life, this is a manifestation of this behavior that causes these problems in my life and creates all this joy in my life, too.” The compilation is published on the Dust to Digital label, who also released Art of Field Recording Volume I: 50 Years of Traditional American Music (other Volumes are comin’ up), consisting of 4 CDs and a 96 Page Book documented by artists/archivists Art and Margo Rosenbaum, as well as Victrola Favorites: Artifacts from Bygone Days, compiled by Rob Millis and Jeffery Taylor (of Climax Golden Twins) from their collections of rare 78rpm records and visual ephemera. Millis (who also produced a few excellent compilations of field recordings via Sublime Frequencies, “a collective of explorers dedicated to acquiring and exposing obscure sights and sounds from modern and traditional urban and rural frontiers ” headed by Hisham Mayet and Alan Bishop of the band Sun City Girls) and Taylor’s interest began when they sampled some 78s in their own music. “We often used other people’s records in sound collages, and 78s seemed like a weirder, scratchier kind of record to be using. After a while, we realised there’s a lot of great music from this era, and we started to look at the records not just as something to sample from, but as beautiful objects in themselves.” The duo started to collect old Victrolas, and scoured hundreds of second-hand shops and jumble sales for records. They found that a well-established collectors’ market had already pushed up prices for jazz and blues 78s, but that, at that stage, country, hillbilly and other music from around the world remained affordable (eBay has now radically transformed this market, and even some of Millis’ acquisitions from Asia now go for $1,500 a pop). That Victrola Favorites has been a labour of love is instantly apparent from the package accompanying the music, which includes a cloth-bound 144-page book filled with gorgeous images of 78s, phonographs and other musical ephemera from the early 20th century. In his accompanying essay, Millis explains how their aim was to see the music “revealed but not deciphered” – that is, not to bombard the consumer with historical information, but merely to access the music and make it presentable to contemporary tastes.

“Pictures of a gone world”, that’s how Pat Conte, who curates the Secret Museum Of Mankind series, describes these transcriptions of ethnic music from 78rpm discs. They are all part of an expanding landscape of anthologies and reissues, which are for the most part products of obsessive record collectors, distributed by small independent labels (not coincidentally, in many cases the record geeks and labels are affiliated with record shops. Nagoski owns one, for that matter) or just free on the Web. One wonderful example is Jon Ward’s Excavated Shellac blog (one of the many “sharity” blogs out there), focusing on ethnic music on 78’s. Ward uploads a new disc every Monday and, as Steve Roden recently commented, “it is always stuff you would never hear anywhere else, nothing here on CD. This is the rarest of the rare and the best of the best”.
All these examples illustrate that archival practices are moving away from – or at least paralleling – the “formal” procedures of memory institutions and instead tend to go into “informal” areas of archiving and dissemination, triggered by subjective interests, by fans, geeks and ethousiasts, who just want to share their own experiences with the rest of the world (I wrote about this in an article titled ‘de tijd van loslaten‘, translated “time for letting go”). There’s an article in this month’s the Wire in which Simon Reynolds comments on this evolution. Taking Mutant Sounds as an example, he writes: “the impetus used to be: I have something that no one else has. But with the advent of sharity blogging that’s shifted to: I’ve just got hold of something no one else’s got. So I’m immediately going to make it available to EVERYBODY.” But Reynolds also points out that there might be a downside to all this. “Perhaps the real danger represented by the sharity scene is actually to music fans. The whole-album blogs – like the web in general, with its vast array of net radio stations, DJ mixes, official giveaways, etc – drastically exacerbates the conditions known as collector-itis whose symptons were recently identified by Johan Klugelberg as “constipation, indegestion, flatulence”. Writing in Old Rare New, an anthology of elegiac paeans to the record shop, he described how the music fan succumbs to “Falstaffian gluttony… eating at the biggest buffet, heaping and piling exotic foodstuffs not only from all around the globe, but spanning history, on your plate” and coating the intestines of one’s hard drive with “noxious build-up””. Touché.

UPDATE (Oct 24): Jon Ward ruminates a bit on the subject
(…) “There is more at work, however, than Reynolds’ assumption that music bloggers use their medium to simply brag about their rare finds and then immediately make them available to the entire world. I’m sure it’s true in many cases (like Mutant Sounds, which is the subject of that paragraph), but I am absolutely resolute in the fact that I use this medium as an exorcism for my own peculiar obsessions. There is no good goddamn reason to be a music collector – they’re a dime a dozen these days. Because being a music collector means that you’ve transcended simply being a lover of music, and moved on to a person who accumulates and obsesses. I am under no allusions that providing music here is some kind of noble act. No way, Ray. But in order to continue to justify this obsession, I must actually do something with it that rewards me somehow – and obviously that is sharing something personal with a listener/viewer.” (…)

btw: also check out the compilations on Honest Jon’s Records, especially ‘Sprigs of Time: 78’s From The EMI Archive’, a compilation drawn from a two-year stint trawling through EMI’s archive of some 150,000 78s recorded in all corners of the world between 1903 and 1957.

Lossless

8_losslessstill.png

I stumbled upon an interesting project by Doug Goodwin and Rebecca Baron, part of which was shown in the context of the workshop “Designing for Forgetting and Exclusion” at the UCLA Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, organised by Jean-François Blanchette (who was at our Media, Memory & the Archive conference last year).

A few snippets from the introductory text on this workshop. “Today the rapid spread of information and communication technologies has been accompanied by a redrawing of the boundaries between the forgotten and the remembered, between that which is included and that which is excluded from the permanent record. As storage technologies have gained in practicality and dropped in price, the shift to an electronic medium has changed the default position from one of forgetfulness to one of remembering. The importance of this shift can be seen in recent policies that mandate that telecommunications operators, for law enforcement purposes, preserve data for increased periods of time; in technologies that, in order to provide businesses with sharp pictures of consumptions patterns and fraud, mine extended time series; and in the attention paid to metadata schemas whose goal is to increase the long-term value of these electronic memories.

Commentators have typically portrayed the protection of forgetfulness as a matter of balancing individual privacy against such social goods as law enforcement, government efficiency, or national security. But in this form of analysis such social needs almost inevitably overpower the need of individuals. In an attempt to redress this imbalance, this project will proceed within a framework where collective needs for forgetting are explicitly balanced against collective needs for accountability. It will thus further an understanding of forgetting as a positive social good, one that may promote the development of the kinds of individuals necessary for democracy, rather than as a failure of memory and inclusiveness.”

Baron and Goodwin’s Lossless project consists of a series of works that looks at the dematerialization of film into bits, exposing the residual effects of the processes that makes digital distribution possible. They used several methods to alter existing works, either interrupting the data streaming by removing basic information holding together the digital format or comparing 35 mm to DVD and examining the difference between each frame. The project considers the impact of the digital age on filmmaking and film watching, the materiality and demateriality of film as an artistic medium, as well as the social aspects of how the online community functions and the audience for such obscure films.

frames.jpg

Lossless #1 (2007) is a 16mm film loop showing Dorothy’s shadowy, fluttering ruby slippers endlessly clicking. The image is derived using custom software comparing 35mm film frames against DVD compressed frames.


“We’ve seen “The Wizard of Oz” more times than any other movie. We may imagine it playing on a big screen
in full Technicolor as it was shown in 1939. But the truth is that we’ve only seen it on television. Now that we may buy the digitally enhanced DVD and watch the ”Wizard of Oz” on our laptop computers, we wanted to know exactly how the media had changed. By capturing the differences between a 35mm print and a digital version, Lossless shows exactly what has changed. We started the project by looking for the best and worst versions of ”The Wizard of Oz.” We soon realized that it would be impossible to secure the best version.
George Eastman House has preserved an original negative (or negatives as it is a three- strip technicolor separation print). These negatives were scanned to create the 2005 Ultra-Resolution DVD. This DVD looks better than any other release we have found, including the 35mm print. So we were led away from the idea of measuring against a best version to calculating the total difference between two releases of the movie. Media re-issues always promote improvements in fidelity. This project asks you to consider that fidelity by showing the difference between the film and digital renderings of ”The Wizard of Oz.” What is greater fidelity for those of us who grew up watching this film on Television? It is curious to see detail in the shadows, to see a rivet in the middle of the Tin-Man’s face, and to see Kansas in sepia tones for the first time. What we really want is to get back in touch with that feeling we had the first time we saw the film. This feeling is something that cannot be restored by fidelity to the original, at least not for the TV generation.”

lossless_3.jpg

In the meantime they have produced other versions. Lossless #2 is a three-minute video constructed from a bit torrent file of Maya Deren’s Meshes in the Afternoon in the process of being downloaded. Lossless #3 is a video in which missing keyframes from a clip of John Ford’s The Searchers turns the American West into a melting ribbon of ochre and rust. Lossless #4 is an animation showing the motion vectors that propel blocks of color between keyframes in Ernie Gehr’s structuralist piece Serene Velocity. Lossless #5 uses some of the same techniques, applied to a Busby Berkeley extravaganza.

mg_lossless-2-copyinside.jpg

“We see lossless as a starting point, an entry into a new form which uses existing work only to introduce an investigation into the textures and potential of a new medium. The lossless series uses references to facilitate experiments in a new medium. what otherwise might be disconnected abstraction has a clear referent (work by maya deren & alex hamid, john ford, ernie gehr, busby berkeley) that helps us look at the ways representation in digital video departs from traditional (film) cinema. Heavy dependance on prior work always concerns me. It makes me think of how much ancient drama (especially aristophanes) is lost to us. I know all the jokes about Cleon and Pericles whip right over my head, and Aristophanes’ dependance on in-jokes ruins whole scenes of otherwise great drama. Our choices are not arbitrary, and we like to think that they elicudate the insectigation for anyone who cares to think about the intertextuality, but this is not required. Each of the pieces starts with a rule. it investigates one area of digital media (compression, file-sharing, spatial flows, performance of media, representation as instruction, etc.)”

More info on Doug Goodwin’s site.
I’m sure some of these experiments might turn up in one of our programs, sooner or later.

If you can Hear it, you can Have it (1)

knizak1a.jpg

“You can’t steal a gift. If you can hear it, you can have it”
– Dizzy Gillespie to Phil Woods in 1956, talking about Charlie Parker’s music and its influence on Woods

I’m preparing a little article for RUIS about music in the era of intellectual property, network technology and remix culture, partly in response to the proposed copyright extension (see previous post). So I went through my record (and file) collection a bit, tracking down some traces of “sampling” and “remix” practices. For your pleasure, here are some fine early and contemporary examples of (technological and explicit) musical appropriation and re-organisation.

Richard Maxfield, Amazing Grace, 1960
[audio:Maxfield_amazing-grace.mp3]
Richard Maxfield (US, 1927-1969) is one of the little-sung names in American avant-garde music. “For someone nearly forgotten today, Maxfield had a tremendous impact—largely through his classes at The New School in New York, which attracted radically avant-garde musicians such as Joseph Byrd, Dick Higgins, and even John Cage himself. Born in Seattle in 1927, Maxfield had studied with Krenek, Babbitt, Sessions, and Dallapiccola, but left this Eurocentric background behind to move toward a Cagean experimentalism.” Eventually he made contributions to the so-called “minimalism” movement, while forecasting a wide range of developments in the future of electronic music. ‘Amazing Grace’ mixes tape loops from two sources: a speech by revivalist James G. Brodie and electronic fragments from an opera Maxfield had made in 1958 entitled ‘Stacked Deck’. The loops play back at various speeds, causing the fragments to overlap in complex ways. This method would later be explored further by Terry Riley, Steve Reich and others. “It is astonishing how many threads of 1960s music seem to begin with the ideas Maxfield explores, and it is a tragedy that his early death, from leaping out a window at age 42, kept him from participating in the more rewarding scene that would later appear.”
available on ‘Oak of the Golden Dreams’ (New World Records)

James Tenney, Collage No. 1 (“Blue Suede”), 1961
[audio:Tenney_Collage1.mp3]
James Tenney (US, 1934-2006) must be one of most stylistically diverse composers in 20th century music, having studied or worked with a host of famed American mavericks, including Harry Partch, Edgard Varese, Carl Ruggles and John Cage. From orchestra pieces to tape works, from serial procedures to minimalism, from explorations in microtonality to collage: “he mended the differences between musical worlds and bridged the gaps between extremes” (Jenny Lin). One of those gaps was between the so-called “avant-garde” and pop music. In 1961 he worked on ‘Collage No. 1 (“Blue Suede”)’ in an electronic music studio at the University of Illinois. It was just five years after the release of ‘Blue Suede Shoes,’ the Elvis Presley record which he sampled (which is in itself a version of a Carl Perkins song). This track was later used by Stan Brakhage as a soundtrack for his Christ Mass Sex Dance (1991), composed of six rolls of superimposed images as a “celebration of the balletic restraints of adolescent sexuality─shaped (in this instance) by The Nutcracker Suite of Tchaikovsky as well as the gristly roots of Elvis Presley”. Brakhage and Tenney were actually really good friends, ever since they worked together on Interim (1952), Brakhage’s first film (he was 19 years old) and Tenney’s first composition (who was 18). They remained friends and collaborators for the rest of their lives. Tenney made another tape collage in 1967: Collage #2 (Viet Flakes), which is the soundtrack to a film of the same name, by (then partner) Carolee Schneemann (he also appears in her wonderful Fuses). The film is a collage of violent images from the Vietnam War, while Tenney’s composition collages bits of audio from sources such as Vietnamese and Classical music, along with American Pop music.
available on ‘James Tenney: Selected Works 1961-1969’ (New World records)

knizak.jpeg

Milan Knizak, Composition No. 3, 1963-64
[audio:Knizak_compostition-no3.mp3]
I recently discovered Milan Knizak’s Broken Music, which was first published in 1979, but reissued on CD by Ampersand in 2002. Knizak (CZ, 1940) is a wellknown Czech artist, who was a member of the Fluxus movement in the 1960’s and founder of the short-lived but influential rock project ‘Aktual’ (1967 – 1971). Together with other Aktual members, Knizak put on (and was arrested for) some of the first aesthetic “happenings” in Eastern Europe, which blended sculpture, music and audience participation. The pieces on Broken Music are part of his “Destroyed Music” series, music and sculpture made out of scratched, warped, defective and damaged records. Knizak acquired a gramophone and collection of records and experimented by playing them speeded up or slowed down, and later damaging them by burning them, gluing layers on, putting together bits of different records, scratching and so on. He wasn’t the first to do this – Hongarian constructivist László Moholy-Nagy did similar experiments in the 1920’s, for example – but Knizak developped these ideas further. He wrote: “In 1963-64 I used to play records both too slowly and too fast and thus changed the quality of the music, thereby, creating new compositions. In 1965 I started to destroy records: scratch them, punch holes in them, break them. By playing them over and over again (which destroyed the needle and often the record player too) an entirely new music was created – unexpected, nerve-racking and aggressive. Compositions lasting one second or almost infinitely long (as when the needle got stuck in a deep groove and played the same phrase over and over). I developed this system further. I began sticking tape on top of records, painting over them, burning them, cutting them up and gluing different parts of records back together, etc. to achieve the widest possible variety of sounds. A glued joint created a rhythmic element separating contrasting melodic phrases… Since music that results from playing ruined gramophone records cannot be transcribed to notes or to another language (or if so, only with great difficulty), the records themselves may be considered as notations at the same time.” Knizak not only started seeing his treated records as a certain kind of musical notation in itself, but he also decided to treat traditional scores in the same way as the records. In a later phase, he started treating the records as “art objects” as well, focussing on their visual, decorative aspects.
available on ‘Broken Music’ (Ampersand)

Arthur Lipsett, Free Fall, 1964
[audio:Lipsett_FREEFALL.mp3]
I’ve posted about Lipsett’s (CA, 1936-1986) work on several occassions now, so no need to introduce him again, I guess. This piece is the soundtrack of his 1964 film Free Fall. It is featured on a compilation of his soundtracks, recently published by Global A. The importance of sound in his work, as instructions for observing and critiquing the images, is highlighted by this piece, which illustrates Lipsett’s highly structured system of field recordings, loops, speech and music. In the proposal for Free Fall he describes the film as an “attempt to express in filmic terms an intensive flow of life – a vision of a world in the throes of creativity – the transformation of physical phenomena into psychological ones – a visual bubbling of picture and sound operating to create a new continuity of experience – a reality in seeing and hearing which would continually overwhelm the conscious state – penetration of outward appearances – suddenly the continuity is broken – it is as if all clocks ceased to tick – summoned by a big close-up or fragment of a diffuse nature – strange shapes shine forth from the abyss of timelessness.” Free Fall features dazzling pixilation, in-camera superimpositions, percussive tribal music, syncopated rhythms and ironic juxtapositions. Using a brisk “single-framing” technique, Lipsett attempts to create a synesthesic experience through the intensification of image and sound. Citing the film theorist Sigfreud Kracauer, Lipsett writes, “Throughout this psychophysical reality, inner and outer events intermingle and fuse with each other – ‘I cannot tell whether I am seeing or hearing – I feel taste, and smell sound – it’s all one – I myself am the tone.’” Incidentally, Free Fall was intended as a collaboration with the American composer John Cage, modeled on his system of chance operations. However, Cage subsequently withdrew his participation fearing Lipsett would attempt to control and thereby undermine the aleatory organization of audio and visuals. (Thx, Brett Kashmere)
available on ‘Soundtracks’ (Global A)

Steve Reich, Come Out, 1966
[audio:Reich_Come-Out.mp3]
Steve Reich (US, 1936) was asked to write this piece to be performed at a benefit for the retrial of the Harlem Six – six black youths arrested for committing a murder during the 1964 Harlem riots for which only one of the six was responsible. Truman Nelson, a civil rights activist and the person who had asked Reich to compose the piece, gave him a collection of tapes with recorded voices to use as source material. Presumably, Reich’s response was: “Look, I’ll do this, and I’ll do it for nothing, but you’ve got to let me make a piece out of anything I find.” Nelson, who chose Reich on the basis of ‘It’s Gonna Rain’, made the year before, agreed to give him creative freedom for the project. Reich eventually used the voice of Deniel Hemm, one of the boys involved in the riots but not responsible for the murder. In the interview he says: “I had to, like, open the bruise up and let some of the bruise blood come out to show them” (alluding to how Hamm had punctured a bruise on his own body to convince police that he had been beaten). The police had not previously wanted to treat Hamm’s injuries, since he did not appear seriously wounded. Reich re-recorded the fragment on two channels, which initially play in unison. They quickly slip out of sync to produce a phase shifting effect. Gradually, the discrepancy widens and becomes a reverberation and, later, almost a canon. The two voices then split into four, looped continuously, then eight, until the actual words are unintelligible. The listener is left with only the rhythmic and tonal patterns of the spoken words. Reich says of using recorded speech as source material that “by not altering its pitch or timbre, one keeps the original emotional power that speech has while intensifying its melody and meaning through repetition and rhythm”. This piece has been used in 1982 by the Belgian choreographer Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker as part of one of her seminal works entitled Fase. It was also (re)sampled by Madvillain, UNKLE and many others.
available on ‘Early Works’ (Nonesuch)

terryrileyyou-renogood.jpg

Terry Riley, You’re No Good, 1968
[audio:Riley_You’re-No-Good.mp3]
In 1967 Terry Riley (US, 1935) was playing one of his “All Night Flight” concerts in Philadephia, featuring his soprano saxophone, keyboards, and tape delay devices, which went on for hours in the trance-inducing Minimalist fashion. After the show the proprietor of a local discotheque asked Riley to compose a piece to be played in his club, and Riley obliged with a version of Harvey Averne’s ‘You’re No Good’, a single off Averne’s 1968 Atlantic LP Viva Soul. Riley took the Motown-inspired pop tune and transformed it into a twenty-minute exploded view, slicing the track into long and short bits and looping them, as Steve Reich had done a few years earlier. The Riley remix is wonderfully perverse: beginning with a two-and-a-half-minute piercing sine wave drone, increasing in pitch to the point of unbearability before suddenly breaking into the Averne song, which becomes more and more fragmented and complex, towards the end adding Moog shrieks. This piece was used as a soundtrack for Nick Relph and Oliver Payne’s Mixtape (2002), a video that evokes youth through the carpe diem reappropriation of situations and objects. The soundtrack structures the video, determining its length and editing style.
available via the (Cortical Foundation)

Jon Appleton, Chef d’œuvre, 1967
[audio:Appleton_chef-doeuvre.mp3]
Jon Appleton’s (US, 1939) work was recommended to me by Aki Onda a few years ago. His electroacoustic music consists of three distinct approaches: the abstract manipulation of timbre, the compositions he made for Synclavier – one of the first digital synthesizers he helped developping – and the use of ‘found musics’ and recognizable objets sonores. ‘Chef d’œuvre’ is part of the last approach. He writes: “It is my Boléro. It is the work of mine that has been most frequently played and recorded. Using the sounds of a singing commercial for Chef-Boy-Ar-Dee pizzas by the Andrews Sisters, there is a frenetic pace and sense of humor which can be heard in subsequent works.” Also check out his excellent piece ‘Newark Airport Rock’, which was based on some interviews he did while he stranded by weather at the Newark airport on a night in 1967. He asked his fellow passengers “what do you think about the new electronic music?” and later assembled the choicest answers, placed them on a bed of sequenced, electronic sound produced by a Moog synthesizer. Also wortwhile: his 1969 collaboration with Don Cherry, released on Bob Thiele’s Flying Dutchman Label.
available on ‘Contes de la mémoire’ (empreintes DIGITALes)

Holger Czukay, Boat Woman Song, 1969
[audio:Czukay_Boat-Woman-Song.mp3]
Around the same time Holger Czukay (DE, 1938) started out with CAN, he teamed up with producer Rolf Dammers to record a solo album, titled Canaxis. Czukay was heavily influenced by Stockhausen, with whom he studied from 1963 to 1966, especially by his compositions Telemusik (1966) and Hymnen (1968), which used multitudes of inserted and altered ethnic recordings. “I wanted to come closer to an old, an ever-recurring dream” Stockhausen wrote about Telemusik, “to go a step forward towards writing, not ‘my’ music, but a music of the whole world, of all lands and races.” It’s no coincidence then that most of Canaxis is recorded on ‘pirated’ time in the Electronic Music Studios at WDR Köln, which was then led by Stockhausen himself. Czukay took Stockhausen’s methods and pushed them farther, precursoring the art and craft we now call “sampling”. This album was assembled from thousands of snippets recorded from short wave radio, a long standing obsession of Czukay’s which he also incorporated into some of Can’s later albums. ‘Boat-Woman-Song’ is the first track. This is what Head Heritage says about it: “it starts off with a fragment of an Adam de la Halle piece that Can also used on occasion in their earliest gigs. But Holger takes the last bit, this “Dee, dee, dee, dee, dee” phrase and begins to loop it. This becomes the underpinning for the first and last sections of the composition. A wailing vocal then overlays this, and the electronics phase in and out in a drifting interplay. But then, out of nowhere, this bass-propelled groove develops. And over the top, Holger drops in some Vietnamese singers. It’s this magic moment where we step away from just dropping bits of tape into the fray and into the first glimmers of sampling methodology. And it is nicely done, too. The rest of the track takes us back to the de la Halle loop, but now everything’s been shifted downward in pitch and tempo. The electronics re-enter, more abstract than in the previous…well, we’ll call it what it is…A section, and it’s these drifting electronic tones, like pitch-shifted horns, that lead us out of the work.” For many years Canaxis was a real rarity, as only 1000 copies were printed and it was only released in Germany, but now it has been reissued, including a one-off recording of a brief jazz composition from German radio, which was Czukay’s first broadcast work.
available on ‘Canaxis’ (Mute)

Jan-Olof Mallander, Degnahc Ev’uoy, 1970
[audio:Mallander_Degnahc-Evuoy.mp3]
J.O. Mallander (FI, 1944) is a swedish-finnish artist who worked within the infamous Sperm collective in the late 1960’s, along with Matti-Juhani Koponen and other visual and musical artists. He is reported to be the one who brought back the infamous Velvet Underground flexidisc from Aspen magazine (in NYC) which was a huge influence on Pekka Airaksinen, the musical force of Sperm. It was these frequent boat trips (he would work there) that gave him the opportunity to experience the massive artistic revolution of the time. He met and became friends with Nam June Paik and connected with the Fluxus movement. Mallander’s first musical outing, the single ‘1962/1968’ from 1968, was based on the sounds of vote-counters repeating “Kekkonen”, the name of the overwhelming winner the presidential elections in 1962 an ’68, over and over again. In 1970 his ‘Decompositions’ ep was published (on LOVE records), on which he deconstructed well-known jazz recordings by deliberately jumping the needle of the record player or changing the structures of the songs. ‘Degnahc Ev’uoy’ was one of the tracks on this ep and basically consists of the jazz standard “You’ve Changed” played backwards. I also read about his piece ‘In Reality’, made in 1969 for the Text-Sound festival in Stockholm, which seems to be a collage of various versions of Cole Porter’s ‘I Got You Under My Skin’, slipping in and out of loops. I haven’t heard it yet, so if anyone could tell me where I could find it… I’m really curious.
available on ‘More Time – Hits & Variations 1968-1970’ (Anoema recordings)

John Adams, Christian Zeal and Activity, 1973
[audio:Adams_christian-zeal.mp3]
‘Christian Zeal’ is from John Adams’s (US, 1947) early period of composition and part of the triptych ‘American Standard’ (this is the original version, which was released on Brian Eno’s Obscure label. I left part 3 in). Adams wrote about it: “American Standard was written under the influence of the English experimental composers of the 1960’s, particularly Cornelius Cardew and the Scratch Orchestra. Cardew’s aim, in keeping with this anti-elitist politics of art, was to create a kind of new Gebrauchmusik, a body of work that could be played by performers with only the minimum of technical abilities. But now, twenty years later, I realize that my New England sensibilities still came through loud and clear in Christian Zeal & Activity, and the mixture of the serene, almost stationary homophonies of the hymn, contrasted with the gritty, active sound of the human voice, was a subconscious reenactment of the scenario of Ives’ Unanswered Question.” ‘Zeal’ is constructed of a simple chorale-like chordal structure played by strings and a sparse woodwind section. A series of suspensions delays resolution of the harmonies until the very end of the piece, with only a few authentic cadences throughout the piece. The unique aleatoric element is what really makes the piece special. The conductor is directed to place “sonic found objects” into the composition. Originally a an unedited recording of a 1971 sermon was used. In more recent versions, Edo De Waart, conductor of the San Francisco Symphony Orchestra spliced and looped this recording, drawing even more emotion from the pastor’s words and from the music itself. The piece has recently been ressurected: in January 2008 it was performed as part of a concert from the Wordless Music Series in New York City, alongside pieces of Jonny Greenwood and Gavin Bryars.
The new version is available on Adams’ Earbox collection.

gavin_jesusblood.jpg

Gavin Bryars, Jesus Blood Never Failed Me Yet (excerpt), 1975
[audio:Bryars_Jesus_Blood_Never_Failed_Me_Yet.mp3]
In the words of Gavin Bryars (GB, 1943) himself: “In 1971, when I lived in London, I was working with a friend, Alan Power, on a film about people living rough in the area around Elephant and Castle and Waterloo Station. In the course of being filmed, some people broke into drunken song – sometimes bits of opera, sometimes sentimental ballads – and one, who in fact did not drink, sang a religious song “Jesus’ Blood Never Failed Me Yet”. This was not ultimately used in the film and I was given all the unused sections of tape, including this one. When I played it at home, I found that his singing was in tune with my piano, and I improvised a simple accompaniment. I noticed, too, that the first section of the song – 13 bars in length – formed an effective loop which repeated in a slightly unpredictable way. I took the tape loop to Leicester, where I was working in the Fine Art Department, and copied the loop onto a continuous reel of tape, thinking about perhaps adding an orchestrated accompaniment to this. The door of the recording room opened on to one of the large painting studios and I left the tape copying, with the door open, while I went to have a cup of coffee. When I came back I found the normally lively room unnaturally subdued. People were moving about much more slowly than usual and a few were sitting alone, quietly weeping. I was puzzled until I realised that the tape was still playing and that they had been overcome by the old man’s singing. This convinced me of the emotional power of the music and of the possibilities offered by adding a simple, though gradually evolving, orchestral accompaniment that respected the tramp’s nobility and simple faith. Although he died before he could hear what I had done with his singing, the piece remains as an eloquent, but understated testimony to his spirit and optimism.” The piece was first performed at the Queen Elizabeth Hall in December 1972, recorded and (also) released on Brian Eno’s Obscure label in 1975 (limited to a duration of 25 minutes). A substantially revised and extended version, featuring Tom Waits singing along with the original recording, was published on Point Records in 1993. William Forsythe used the piece as the score for a dance piece.
available on Point Music

Part 2